<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Love Vs Lie Detector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/08/20/love-vs-lie-detector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/08/20/love-vs-lie-detector/</link>
	<description>A weblog of Rahul Jauhari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devina</title>
		<link>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/08/20/love-vs-lie-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-4114</link>
		<dc:creator>Devina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rahuljauhari.com/?p=966#comment-4114</guid>
		<description>Bang on. &#039;Do you love him?&#039; is a question so open to interpretation, it&#039;s not funny. it depends on what the lady perceives as love. It depends on what the guy on the receiving end -- her husband -- perceives as love. And while these two may be entirely different definitions, what the viewer perceives to be love might be a third thing altogether.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Human beings are emotional, and as emotions cannot be quantified, let&#039;s just say essay-type questions work better for us than multiple-choice, huh?? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes TV channels forget the line between sensational and  insensitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bang on. &#39;Do you love him?&#39; is a question so open to interpretation, it&#39;s not funny. it depends on what the lady perceives as love. It depends on what the guy on the receiving end &#8212; her husband &#8212; perceives as love. And while these two may be entirely different definitions, what the viewer perceives to be love might be a third thing altogether.</p>
<p>Human beings are emotional, and as emotions cannot be quantified, let&#39;s just say essay-type questions work better for us than multiple-choice, huh?? </p>
<p>Sometimes TV channels forget the line between sensational and  insensitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devina</title>
		<link>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/08/20/love-vs-lie-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>Devina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rahuljauhari.com/?p=966#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>Bang on. &#039;Do you love him?&#039; is a question so open to interpretation, it&#039;s not funny. it depends on what the lady perceives as love. It depends on what the guy on the receiving end -- her husband -- perceives as love. And while these two may be entirely different definitions, what the viewer perceives to be love might be a third thing altogether.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Human beings are emotional, and as emotions cannot be quantified, let&#039;s just say essay-type questions work better for us than multiple-choice, huh?? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sometimes TV channels forget the line between sensational and  insensitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bang on. &#39;Do you love him?&#39; is a question so open to interpretation, it&#39;s not funny. it depends on what the lady perceives as love. It depends on what the guy on the receiving end &#8212; her husband &#8212; perceives as love. And while these two may be entirely different definitions, what the viewer perceives to be love might be a third thing altogether.</p>
<p>Human beings are emotional, and as emotions cannot be quantified, let&#39;s just say essay-type questions work better for us than multiple-choice, huh?? </p>
<p>Sometimes TV channels forget the line between sensational and  insensitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Jauhari</title>
		<link>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/08/20/love-vs-lie-detector/comment-page-1/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Jauhari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rahuljauhari.com/?p=966#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>Hey Sanjeev - appreciate the sentiment and the fact that you took time out to post it here.&lt;br&gt;I also read your post - at least you have a clear point of view.&lt;br&gt;As far as my personal opinion goes, I do not like the fact that Sach Ka Saamana keeps touting the &quot;participant is adult and knows what he/she is walking into&quot; premise constantly.&lt;br&gt;Yes, there is tremendous hypocrisy around - and we need to make our own choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sanjeev &#8211; appreciate the sentiment and the fact that you took time out to post it here.<br />I also read your post &#8211; at least you have a clear point of view.<br />As far as my personal opinion goes, I do not like the fact that Sach Ka Saamana keeps touting the &#8220;participant is adult and knows what he/she is walking into&#8221; premise constantly.<br />Yes, there is tremendous hypocrisy around &#8211; and we need to make our own choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
