<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>24 Belvedere Estate &#187; Poverty Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rahuljauhari.com/category/poverty-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rahuljauhari.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bow-Wow or Wow?</title>
		<link>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/01/26/bow-wow-or-wow/</link>
		<comments>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/01/26/bow-wow-or-wow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rjauhari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dharavi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty Porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karara.info/rahuljauharicom/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aunt GG &#38; uncle Oscar have stirred up a debate here. One side is wagging its tail in the afterglow of &#8220;India&#8217;s&#8221; 10 nominations. The other is baring its fangs at the laid-bare-naked rendition of Mumbai&#8217;s &#8220;underbelly.&#8221; One side lauds the Indian actors and music maestro Rehman. The other says it&#8217;s a case of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aunt GG &amp; uncle Oscar have stirred up a debate here.</p>
<p>One side is wagging its tail in the afterglow of &#8220;India&#8217;s&#8221; 10 nominations.<br />
The other is baring its fangs at the laid-bare-naked rendition of Mumbai&#8217;s &#8220;underbelly.&#8221;</p>
<p>One side lauds the Indian actors and music maestro Rehman.<br />
The other says it&#8217;s a case of a westerner&#8217;s take on India being applauded by westerners &#8211; nothing for us Indians to celebrate.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s set a few things aside first.</p>
<p>I liked the book when I read it &#8211; long back.<br />
I liked the film when I saw it &#8211; recently.</p>
<p>No debate there.<br />
Not even a whimper.</p>
<p>The trouble seems to have started with the doggoned film <em>winning it.</em><br />
Now that it <em>has</em> won at the GG and <em>could</em> win at the Big O, the time seems perfect to:</p>
<ol>
<li>bristle at the fact that the darker side of India is yet again the target of global eyeballs.</li>
<li>howl out loud at the city&#8217;s inhuman apathy towards Dharavi</li>
<li>snap at the heels of a new term called poverty porn</li>
</ol>
<p>I am not going to debate which side is right or wrong.<br />
Rather focus on the fact why all this barking is actually happening.</p>
<p>It is NOT because:</p>
<ol>
<li>Dharavi has been a victim of state apathy for eons.</li>
<li>This film again focuses on the grimmer side of our reality.</li>
<li>Anybody actually gives a shit about any &#8216;slumdog.&#8217;</li>
</ol>
<blockquote><p>Would anyone have raised such a hue and cry had the film flopped at the international circuit?<br />
I don&#8217;t think so.</p></blockquote>
<p>The book didn&#8217;t raise as many hackles when it was released.<br />
Why has the film done it?</p>
<p>Because it has won.</p>
<p>Never mind the fact it has been made by an non-Indian.<br />
And applauded by Hollywood.<br />
It has won.</p>
<p>You can ignore failures.<br />
But you cannot ignore an artist&#8217;s finely crafted impression of an unignorable real issue.</p>
<p>So if you ask me, what&#8217;s the best thing about Slumdog Millionaire?<br />
That it is very well made.<br />
That&#8217;s why it raises hackles, draws applause, invites debates.<br />
That&#8217;s what any well-made film does.</p>
<p>This one has won.<br />
Let us applaud it.</p>
<p>As for the Dharavi-Mumbai-Poverty-Porn Debate Society &#8211; if they really felt this strong about the issue, they must have been debating it since years, probably doing a lot about it since years as well.<br />
In that case, they should take a break from all that hard work, go see the film and enjoy some well made cinema.</p>
<p>They have earned the break.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Frahuljauhari.com%2F2009%2F01%2F26%2Fbow-wow-or-wow%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Frahuljauhari.com%2F2009%2F01%2F26%2Fbow-wow-or-wow%2F&amp;source=rjauhari&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rahuljauhari.com/2009/01/26/bow-wow-or-wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

